Galvanizing Flux : Wet or Dry Method

 


Galvanizing Flux : Wet or Dry Method 


The advantages and disadvantages of the dry and wet methods are still disputed, which is better? But the choice depends to a large extent on the quality of the products for  galvanizing.


The main advantages of the dry method

• Higher production capacity.

• Reducing the output Dross.

• Lower operating cost.

The main disadvantages of the dry method:

• Needs a bath (more space)

• Needs heating (energy consumption)

• Needs continuous treatment or shut down to adjust the concentration of the tank and iron content 

• These equipments need continuous and periodic maintenance.

 The main advantages of the wet method:

• Providing space and equipment (there is no bath or heating).

• A layer of Flux on the surface of the zinc kettle gives a better cleaning of the products surface  especially when there were errors in the previous stages.


• In general, it gives less thickness of zinc, especially if the product is pulled through the flux layer, as it is abrasive.

• Increases safety when the products are not dried as it reduces zinc volatilization.

• The amount of ash may be less.

Disadvantages of the wet method:

• The product may be contaminated by flux.

 Rust may occur on the surface of the product, especially if  flux  that  stuck in the cooling pan does not removed.

• Loss of a quantity of zinc when scraping the products of flexi.

The cost of maintaining a layer of Flex on the surface of the zinc basin is more compared to the dry method.

 More Dross output

Increases the appearance of white rust

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treatment and Utilization of Spent Acid that Used in Galvanizing ( Pickling )

Critical Factors of Choosing the Metal for Galvaning

Galvanizing Material